Legal Opinion
In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided June 10, 2009No. MDL 2036PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, Acting Chairman.
Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiff in one Southern District of Florida action (Tomes) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization in the Southern District of Florida of three actions and any later-filed related actions for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff in the District of New Jersey action supports the motion. Defendants Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Wachovia) and Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America) initially opposed centralization of actions involving different bank defendants in one MDL proceeding,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
- In Re Janus Mutual Funds Investment LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
- In Re the Bear Stearns Companies Inc. Securities, Derivative & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- King v. Carolina First BankDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
- Swift v. BancorpSouth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- In Re Credit Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Mortgage Lender Force-Placed Insurance LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.