Legal Opinion

In re Bank of America Credit Protection Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 16, 2011No. MDL No. 2269Published

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in three actions move to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California. Defendants 1 oppose plaintiffs’ motion, as do plaintiffs in the Northern District of Illinois Wong potential tag-along action.

Plaintiffs’ motion encompasses three actions pending, respectively, in the Northern District of California, the Western District of Washington and the Eastern District of Wisconsin.2

*1373On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that these three actions involve common questions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Credit Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In Re Discover Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API