Legal Opinion
In re Mortgage Lender Force-Placed Insurance Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided September 28, 2012No. MDL No. 2388PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in the Southern District of Florida Barreto action move to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation currently consists of 31 actions pending in 14 districts, as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the parties have notified the Panel of more than 25 related actions pending in various federal districts.
*1353All responding defendants1 oppose centralization, as do plaintiffs in more than 30 actions. In the alternative, opposing plaintiffs in 14 actions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009
- In Re Credit Card Payment Protection Plan Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Mortgage Industry Home Affordable Modification Program Contract LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Bank of America, N.A.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re HSBC Mortgage Corp. Force-Placed Hazard Insurance LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
- In re Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013