Louisiana Oil Corporation v. Green
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
POSTER, Justice.
This is an action at law against appellant. It was tried on counts L and K as amended. After count K had been filed, count L was added.
The first contention argued by counsel is that those two counts do not arise out of the same transaction or relate to the same subject-matter. The point was first made by objecting to the filing of count L, and then by demurrer to the complaint as amended..As we construe count K, it is predicated upon a claim for slander of title (Womack v. McDonald, 219 Ala. 75,121 So, 57; Ebersole v. Fields, 181 Ala. 421, 62 So. 73; Dent v. Balch, 213 Ala.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Alcazar Amusement Co. v. Mudd & Colley Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Erswell v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gross v. Lowder Rlty. Better Homes & GardensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Kelite Products, Inc., and R. C. Martin v. Alvin J. Binzel, Jr., Trading as Kelite Products of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Griese-Traylor Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. The First National Bank of Birmingham, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Porter Coal Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.