Legal Opinion

Porter Coal Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1935No. 6 Div. 688PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Plaintiff claims and recovered compensatory and punitive damages against appellant on a claim that defendant’s servants, duly authorized, unlawfully and maliciously prevented plaintiff from going upon defendant’s premises to inspect or check the weighing of coal mined in defendant’s mines after plaintiff had been selected by the miners, or a majority of them, to do so, and after he had made an agreement to that effect with them.

Appellee seems to insist that he has a cause of action regardless of section 1710, Code, on the theory that his contracted rights were wrongfully and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Dearborn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Monroe v. Harco, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Pearson v. Birmingham Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API