Erswell v. Ford
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
The nature of this cause was stated on a former appeal. 205 Ala. 494, 88 South. 429. After its return to the trial court the bill was amended by setting out in hsec verba the letter from Mrs. Erswell to Ford by which the latter was given an exclusive right “until December 31st, 1922 * * * to handle all my [Mrs. Erswell’s] rentals and sales on a commission basis of two and one-half per cent. (2%%) on my Birmingham property, being situated and known as No. 112, No. 114, No. 116, North 19th street, Birmingham, Alabama,” thus eliminating the objection to the bill mainly discussed in the opinion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Chambers & Marshall v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
- Sayre v. Wilson & IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Smith v. SharpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Handley v. HeflinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gross v. Lowder Rlty. Better Homes & GardensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Purcell Co., Inc. v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- James S. Kemper & Co. v. Cox & AssociatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Homa-Goff Interiors, Inc. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.