Legal Opinion
Papst Motoren GMbH & Co. KG v. Kanematsu-Goshu (U.S.A.) Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1986No. 84 Civ. 7194PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Papst Motoren GMbH & Co. KG (“Papst”), a West German limited liability company which manufactures various types of computer motors, charges that defendants have been and are infringing three of its patents: U.S. Letters Patent No. 3,873,897, (“897”) covering an invention entitled “Collector-Less-DC Motor”; U.S. Letters Patent No. 4,429,263, (“263”) covering an invention called “Low Magnetic Leakage Flux Brushless Pulse Control D-C Motor”; and U.S. Letters Patent No. 4,438,542 (“542”) covering an invention entitled, “Disk Storage Drive”. 1
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- B v. Optische Industrie De Oude Delft v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- The IN PORTERS, SA v. Hanes Printables, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Solarex Corp. v. Arco Solar, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.