Legal Opinion
B v. Optische Industrie De Oude Delft v. Hologic, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1995No. 95 Civ. 0539 (PKL)PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
Plaintiffs allege defendants violated (1) the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, and (2) section 2 of the Sherman Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 2. In addition, plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment, see 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that two United States patents origi nally obtained by defendant Hologie are invalid and unenforceable. Defendants, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), move to dismiss the RICO and antitrust claims. In addition, defendants move to dismiss the request for a declaratory…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Concord Associates, L.P. v. Entertainment Properties TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Thomas v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.