Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Kingston

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1980No. 16100PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1288CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs Lavern L. Mendenhall, Vonda Mendenhall and Phyllis Maltby brought an independent action pursuant to Rule 60(b), U.R.C.P. to set aside a foreclosure judgment and the subsequent sale of residential property in Salt Lake City to the defendant J. 0. Kingston.

The defendants moved for summary judgment on the basis that the denial of a prior motion to vacate the judgment, which had been made by Lavern L. Mendenhall and Phyllis Maltby, was res judicata as to the plaintiffs in the present case. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion.

The plaintiffs appeal,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wagar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wheadon v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nevada Industrial Development, Inc. v. BenedettiNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jacobsen v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pepper v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Knudson v. Utah State Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API