Legal Opinion

Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. Morgan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1993No. 920069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a district court order ruling that the 1937 Weber River Decree (the “decree”) does not bar Kamas Hills Ltd. (“Kamas Hills”) from asserting diligence claims to certain artesian springs. The springs are located in the Weber River drainage but have no surface connection with the Weber River or its surface tributaries. We affirm the trial court’s order and hold that the decree did not adjudicate Kamas Hills’ diligence claims and therefore poses no obstacle to their assertion now.

Because our decision turns on the scope of the decree, we begin our…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PROVO RIVER WATER USERS'ASS'N v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API