Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 13, 1940No. 15164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StuicEs.

Appellant brought this action against the respondent in the Court of Common Pleas of Orangeburg County for recovery upon a fire insurance policy. Inter alia, the answer contained the following defense: “ * * * defendant alleges that it is provided in the policy sued upon in the complaint that the policy shall be void if the subject of the insurance be a building on ground not owned by the assured in fee simple, and in this connection the defendant alleges on information and belief that the plaintiff did not own the land upon which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirton v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Kizer v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Neel v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Burkhalter v. Townsend, Admx.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. King v. WesnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Haddock Flying Service v. TisdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Mobley v. Bland & Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API