Mobley v. Bland & Pennsylvania Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurrence
Mr. Associate Justice Baker
(concurring).
This concurring opinion is written as complementary to the opinion of the Chief Justice,
The first question involved in this appeal is whether a domesticated foreign insurance company can be properly served by delivering a copy of the summons to one of its local agents' in this State on a cause of action arising out of the State.
Judge Dennis held that jurisdiction of the appellant was obtained through service made upon appellant’s local agent at Dillon and not by service of the papers as provided in Section 7964, Code of Daws of South Carolina, 1932,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piper v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Benn v. Camel City Coach Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Cox v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Murray v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Andrews v. PooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.