Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Leta

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1985No. 1390, 1422 and 2261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Frank Pried and Joseph Baldassari of Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Anthony Leta of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, were tried nonjury before the Honorable Albert E. Acker, specially presiding, and were found guilty of bookmaking 1 and criminal conspiracy. 2 At trial, the Commonwealth relied upon incriminating evidence acquired by placing a tap on several telephones serving appellants’ respective premises. On direct appeal, the principal arguments made by appellants are that the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act of October 4, 1978, P.L. 831, No. 164, 18…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. ReevesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ReevesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API