Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1985No. 744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Gilbert Harvey was found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to deliver. Included among items of evidence relied upon by the Commonwealth at trial were tape recordings of conversations between Gilbert Harvey and Jeffrey Woods, an informant. These recordings had been made with Woods’ consent pursuant to statutory authorization contained in 18 Pa.C.S. § 5704(2)(ii). On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, Harvey contends that recorded evidence of these conversations should have been suppressed because the statute authorizing…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. FerrettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API