Legal Opinion

Carrao v. Health Care Service Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 23, 1983No. 82-1030PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308), the circuit court entered an order finding that certain previous interlocutory orders involve questions of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and that an immediate appeal would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. We granted defendant’s application for leave to appeal to consider the following questions certified by the trial court:

“1. In the circumstances of this case, where the relevant health care benefits contracts do not explicitly state that the insurer will not pay…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Miner v. Gillette Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dora Township v. Indiana Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Purcell & Wardrope Chartered v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Sarchett v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Elder v. Coronet Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Eshaghi v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API