Legal Opinion
Shipman v. Mitchell
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5596PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. A. S. Walker. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The general nature and facts of this case, as shown by the record, are thus stated by counsel for appellant:
*175“ Shipman sued Mitchell for damages on breach of an implied contract. The petition was filed February 25, 1881.”
“ Mrs. Mitchell owned certain premises situated in the city of Austin, which, on the 23d of June, 1882, she leased until the 20th day of June, 1883, to one Mrs. "Williams. The contract of lease was in writing and stipulated for a certain sum per month as rent, payable monthly in advance. This lease contained a clause that it should expire on the 20th…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Secor v. PestanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by16 opinions
- Overstreet v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Montgomery v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. CooleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- H. L. Null & Co. v. J. S. Garlington & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Street-Whittington Co. v. SayresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.