Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Manning

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1887No. 5458PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from Shackelford. Tried below before the Hon. T. B. Wheeler.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Mrs. Overstreet, broug'ht this suit against E. E. Watts, E. E. Manning, A. P. Eoot, and G. L. Price, to recover from Watts the amount due her from him on three promissory notes, and to foreclose a lien, given by Watts to secure these notes upon a flock of sheep, which, it was alleged, belonged to Watts, but to which the other defendants set up some kind of claim. Watts made no defense, and judgment was taken against him. Eoot and Price pleaded, claiming a half interest in the sheep, by purchase from Watts; and Manning set up a conveyance to him by Watts of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKamey v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Grace v. Wade & MainsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Watkins v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Brothers v. Mundell, Munzesheimer & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shipman v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Lansing Wagon WorksTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lindsay v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Turner v. CochranTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bicocchi v. Casey-Swasey Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Sherman Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API