Legal Opinion

Forstmann v. Culp

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1986No. 1:09-m-00016PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GORDON, Senior District Judge:

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Gunther Forstmann (plaintiff) asserts several claims growing out of a meeting and conversation with Robert Culp, president of Culp, Inc. (defendants), on 1 March 1985. Plaintiff alleges that he initiated the meeting to discuss the possibility that defendant might purchase Baxter-Kelly, Inc., a textile business in Anderson, South Carolina. Plaintiff asserts that defendant agreed, at this meeting, to the following: (1) to pay plaintiff $2000 per week…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Forstmann v. CulpDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  2. Rosnick v. DinsmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. White v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  4. MHC, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988
  5. Norman v. Tradewinds Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API