Legal Opinion
Forstmann v. Culp
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 13, 1987No. Civ. A. No. C-85-1014-GPublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GORDON, Senior District Judge:
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion and supplemental motion to amend the complaint.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed suit on August 19, 1985 alleging breach of contract, quantum meruit, fraud, and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. On October 11, 1985, plaintiff amended the complaint as of right pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants filed their answer on October 15, 1985.
The parties submitted, pursuant to Local Rule 204 of the Middle District of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Jackson v. Laureate, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Marcum v. ZimmerDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- Tschantz v. McCannDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.