Legal Opinion
White v. Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 1, 1992No. 3:91-3486-19PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHEDD, District Judge.
This breach of employment contract and promissory estoppel action is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After carefully reviewing the record and the controlling legal authorities, the Court concludes that the motion should be granted and that summary judgment should be entered in favor of defendant.
I
Summary judgment is proper if "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carlson, David v. Arnot-Ogden Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Goff-Hamel v. Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- May v. Harris Management Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Anthony v. Atlantic Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Cocchiara v. Lithia Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.