Legal Opinion
Housing Authority v. Harris
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 1, 1993No. 14612PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether, under the facts of this case, the plaintiff, the housing authority of the city of Norwalk, was required by Gen*602eral Statutes § 47&-151 to give notice to the defendant, Mary Harris,2 before instituting a summary process action against her. The trial court held that notice was *603not required. The Appellate Court reversed,3 and the plaintiff appealed.4 We affirm.
The Appellate Court opinion sets forth the following undisputed facts. “The defendant, a widowed mother of seven, has been living in Roodner Court, federally subsidized public housing, in Norwalk since…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Lampasona v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Housing Authority v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Ossen v. KreutzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van SickleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Vidiaki, LLC v. Just Breakfast & Things!!! LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Sullivan v. Nameaug Walk-In Medical Center, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.