Legal Opinion
Housing Authority v. Harris
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 18, 1992No. 10802PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant Mary Harris1 appeals from the trial court judgment of possession in favor of the plaintiff, the housing authority of the city of Norwalk (housing authority), in a summary process action. The dispositive issue in this appeal, a question of first impression in this state, is whether the plaintiff was required to include a “Kapa notice”2 in its notice to quit as a condition precedent to commencing the summary process action against the defendant.3 We con-*686elude that a Kapa notice was required in the plaintiffs notice to quit in order to confer jurisdiction on the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Housing Authority v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Sullivan v. Nameaug Walk-In Medical Center, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Housing Authority v. DeleonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Housing Authority v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.