Winer v. New York Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
In this case, the Court, ex mero matu, recalled its mandate in order that it might reconsider its former opinion and decision, that it might, if it should see fit, grant a rehearing. A petition for rehearing had been filed, but it reached this Court after the fifteen-day period had elapsed.
Upon reconsideration of the case, the Court has decided to allow a rehearing on briefs, without oral argument, upon the following questions:
1. Did the bill of complaint contain equity?
2. Was this Court correct in holding in its opinion that: “The facts constituting false and untrue…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Lockett v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Newton v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
- Spencer v. Kemper Investors Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.