Legal Opinion

Winer v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 12, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

In this case, the Court, ex mero matu, recalled its mandate in order that it might reconsider its former opinion and decision, that it might, if it should see fit, grant a rehearing. A petition for rehearing had been filed, but it reached this Court after the fifteen-day period had elapsed.

Upon reconsideration of the case, the Court has decided to allow a rehearing on briefs, without oral argument, upon the following questions:

1. Did the bill of complaint contain equity?

2. Was this Court correct in holding in its opinion that: “The facts constituting false and untrue…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Kenneth B. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. Lockett v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Newton v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
  5. Spencer v. Kemper Investors Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API