Legal Opinion

Lockett v. National Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1942No. 13884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The insurance company, as plaintiff, sought the equitable relief of cancellation of four reinstatements of a policy issued upon the life of the defendant’s husband, and of which she was made the beneficiary; all of such reinstatements having been made within two years before the suit was filed. The court overruled a general and special demurrer filed by the defendant beneficiary, and she excepted. Still other relief was prayed, but in our view of the case it is sufficient here to deal with it as if cancellation had been the only relief sought; and even as to that we will limit…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. PrestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Weems v. American National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Spencer v. Kemper Investors Life Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API