Legal Opinion

Newton v. New York Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 21, 1962No. Civ. No. 7838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

In this action for damages for alleged fraud, concealment and misrepresentation in the issuance and sale of certain life insurance and annuity policies, defendants Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, Dominion Life Assurance Company, and third-party defendant Lloyd Steadman have set forth, as an affirmative defense to plaintiffs’ causes of action, certain “Incontestable Clauses,” contained in the contracts here involved. It is contended that said clauses act as a bar to this action. By reason of the fact that this defense has been raised by third-party defendant Lloyd…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Dibble v. Reliance Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carey v. SchuldtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1957
  2. Moore-Harris Abstract Co. v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State Highway Commission v. BourneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API