Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Keisling

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1999No. 98C-16691; CA A103686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiff, an Oregon voter, appeals from a judgment dismissing as untimely this combined action for declaratory and injunctive relief and petition for judicial review under ORS 183.484. Plaintiffs complaint sought a declaration that Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution,1 required defendant Secretary of State to submit Ballot Measure 62 to Oregon voters in the November 1998 general election as a series of discrete measures for separate votes and sought an injunction ordering him to do so. We affirm.

The chief petitioners of Measure 62 filed the proposed initiative with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Fidanque v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Keisling v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. De Young v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Beal v. City of GreshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Polonsky v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API