Legal Opinion

Langley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1953No. S. F. 18859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff Bert Langley brought this action against defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company for breach of a contract wherein defendant allegedly agreed to furnish plaintiff with power necessary to operate plaintiff’s fish hatchery, and in the event that delivery of power was suspended, to give reasonable notice of such suspension to plaintiff. The evidence at the trial established that a power failure occurred, that defendant did not give plaintiff notice of such failure, and that as a result 78,000 of plaintiff’s trout died. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $12,480 pursuant to a jury…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Eastern R. Co. of NM v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Stockburger v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Acadia, California, Ltd. v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stuart v. Crestview Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. White v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. In Re Providian Credit Card CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API