Legal Opinion

State v. Kacin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2010No. 200407322; A139622PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals an order revoking her probation, based on her failure to pay restitution. She argues that the trial court erred in revoking probation based solely on her late payment of restitution. We agree and reverse and remand.

The facts are not in dispute. After she embezzled almost $136,000 from her employer, defendant was charged with aggravated first-degree theft, ORS 164.057. Following a guilty plea, defendant was convicted, and she was placed on probation for five years — three years of supervised probation and two years of court probation. She paid the victim $7,500 in restitution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. StullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. LaizureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. D. S. (In re C. D. S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API