Legal Opinion

State v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 2015No. 201312263; A156245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking her probation. She assigns error to the trial court’s determination that she violated the terms and conditions of her probation. Because the trial court properly found that defendant did not comply with the condition that she obtain prior authorization from her probation officer before moving, and the trial court indicated that it would have revoked her probation on any single violation standing alone, the trial court did not err. We affirm.

We review the trial court’s decision to revoke probation for an abuse of discretion. State v. Kacin, 237 Or App 66,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KacinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Rivera-WaddleLane County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API