Legal Opinion

State v. Mayfield

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1987No. CC 10-84-01096; CA A32196; SC S33165, S33237PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The state petitions for review of the Court of Appeals’ reversal of defendant’s conviction for sodomy in the first degree. The state argues that the trial court did not err in admitting testimony describing defendant’s alleged sexual abuse of the alleged victim’s sister, which ruling was the basis for the Court of Appeals’ 5-to-4 decision reversing the trial court and remanding the case to the circuit court for a new trial. 80 Or App 305, 722 P2d 1250 (1986). We allowed review to clarify some basic concepts of relevancy. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Defendant was indicted for sodomizing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. GaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API