Legal Opinion
Independent School District No. 9 v. Glass
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1982No. 53634PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The question presented is whether Ford Motor Company (Ford), appellee and appellant intervenor, was the recipient of an erroneous tax refund based on a “freeport exemption,” pursuant to the Okla.Const.art. 10, § 6A. 1 Independent School District No. 9 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma (District) seeks to enjoin the refund.
Ford is a Delaware corporation licensed to do business in Oklahoma. It operates a glass manufacturing plant in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, within the boundaries of Independent School District No. 9, appellant. A portion of Ford’s inventory during the 1977 tax year…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Commonwealth v. Mass. CrincMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy DSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.