Legal Opinion

In re Williams v. Pianka

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 2012No. 98760Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re Williams v. Pianka,

2012-Ohio-5518.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98760 IN RE: LAWRENCE WILLIAMS RELATOR vs. RAYMOND PIANKA, AS JUDGE, ETC. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 458342 Order No. 460163 RELEASE DATE: November 28, 2012 FOR RELATOR Lawrence Williams, pro se 17701 Rookwood Circle Cleveland, Ohio 44112 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Barbara A. Langhenry Interim Director of Law By: Joseph F. Scott Chief Assistant Director of Law City of Cleveland City Hall, Room 106 601 Lakeside…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Gantt v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gannon v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State ex rel. Richard v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Snider v. StapletonOhio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API