Gannon v. Gallagher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The mandamus action was not instituted in conformity with the provision of Section 12286, General Code, that “the application for the writ must be by petition, in the name of the state on the relation of the person applying * *
Appellant pleaded the legal conclusion that he had no adequate remedy at law, which allegation was not admitted by the demurrer.
Section 12287, General Code, provides that “the writ must not be issued in a case where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law.”
From the briefs of counsel it appears that after the mayor demoted…
2Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.