State ex rel. Richard v. Wells
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
On appeal, appellant submits “evidence” that he did in fact file the motion in question in the court of common pleas on April 30, 1991. Similarly, appellee submits “evidence” that the motion was denied on May 14, 1991, and argues that the mandamus action is now moot.
In Miner v. Witt (1910), 82 Ohio St. 237, 92 N.E. 21, we allowed facts outside the record to show that a case had become moot. Accordingly, we find that the cause is moot, and on that basis we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ.,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Ames v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Surafi v. OldfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State ex rel. Rodriguez v. Lorain County Joint Vocational SchoolOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re Williams v. PiankaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.