Legal Opinion
Roehrdanz v. Brill
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 29, 2003No. CX-03-137Published
1Opinion of the Court
668 N.W.2d 217 (2003)
George M. ROEHRDANZ, Respondent,
v.
Toby BRILL, Appellant.
No. CX-03-137.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
August 26, 2003.
Review Granted October 29, 2003.
Andrew D. Parker, Ryan P. Winkler, Smith Parker, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
George M. Roehrdanz, Minneapolis, MN, attorney pro se.
Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge, LANSING, Judge, and WRIGHT, Judge.
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
After respondent sued appellant in conciliation court for unpaid legal fees, respondent removed the matter to district court, where a default judgment was eventually entered. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Coons v. St. Paul CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Lewis v. Contracting Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Wilkins v. City of GlencoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.