Legal Opinion

Martin v. Tully

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1941No. Civ. 11357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants, and from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The complaint which charged fraud on the part of defendants, through the medium of which one of them was successful in purchasing the stock holdings of plaintiffs in that company, was dismissed as to all but two of the defendants, and it was in favor of these that the nonsuit, the subject of this appeal, was granted.

The Reserve Oil and Gas Company, hereinafter called the Reserve, was incorporated in 1932, the plaintiffs acquiring their interests in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hall v. Barber Door Co.California Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stills v. GrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Buist v. C. Dudley DeVelbiss Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. One 1940 Buick SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API