Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1929No. Docket No. 3657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for broker’s commission for procuring a purchaser for real property who was ready, willing, and able to buy it upon the terms specified.

December 13, 1924, the appellant signed a written contract with respondents agreeing to pay $2,000 commissions for the sale of a Los Angeles lot upon terms which were specifically enumerated. Within the five days’ -limitation of time the respondents procured a purchaser who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the property upon the written terms prescribed. The appellant, however, refused to con…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schomer v. R. L. Craig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. O'ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Kux v. Cal-West Lumber Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Gialdini v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API