Legal Opinion

Gialdini v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1933No. Docket No. 4852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

From a judgment of $704.85 which was rendered in favor of the plaintiff as compensation for personal injuries sustained, together with damages to his machine as the result of an automobile collision, the defendants and cross-complainants have appealed. It is contended the judgment is not supported by the evidence and that the findings are in irreconcilable conflict. A motion was also made to this court to vacate the judgment on the ground that the visiting judge who tried the cause was without jurisdiction for the reason that he was not requested to preside as judge therein as required by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Metcalf v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. NajeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API