Legal Opinion

Roos v. Red

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 2005No. B173506PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

Eric Red appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of respondents, Nilda Roos and Wilma Baum, on their respective complaints against Red for wrongful death. Before trial respondents filed a motion in limine requesting the court apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel to factual findings made by the federal bankruptcy court in a discharge proceeding involving the parties. The bankruptcy court specifically found respondents’ wrongful death claims were not discharged by Red’s petition for bankruptcy because the claims were the result of Red’s willful and malicious…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Murphy v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Rodgers v. Sargent Controls & AerospaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Tennison v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API