State v. Clark
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant pleaded guilty to 22 offenses. For three of the convictions, each for identity theft, the court imposed consecutive sentences and, pursuant to ORS 137.750, denied consideration for leave, release, or other sentence modification programs. On appeal, defendant makes the preserved assignment of error that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by denying him consideration for leave, release, and other sentence modification programs under ORS 137.750 1 based on findings of fact to which he did not admit and that a jury did not find beyond a reasonable doubt.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
- State v. Soto-NunezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. TarkingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.