Legal Opinion

State v. Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2006No. C031920CR; A123372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, two counts of criminal possession of a forgery device, ORS 165.032, and 40 counts of identity theft, ORS 165.800. The trial court imposed upward departure sentences on several of the convictions, based on its finding of various aggravating factors. The court also ordered that defendant not be considered for early release and sentence reduction programs. ORS 137.750. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the denial of her motion for a judgment of acquittal with respect to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TarkingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API