Legal Opinion
Douglas' Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 28, 2007No. LD-2003-004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
On July 11, 2003, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition seeking disbarment of the respondent, Caroline G. Douglas. The Judicial Referee (Horton, J.) found by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules) 1.15(a)(1), 1.15(c), 8.4(c) and 8.4(a), and recommended a five-year suspension as a sanction. The committee recommends disbarment. We conclude that the respondent’s conduct warrants disbarment.
I
The referee made the following findings of fact. On June 14, 1994, Marjorie VanderKruik…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richmond's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Wolterbeek's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Coffey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Morgan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Nardi's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wyatt’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Conner’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- O'Meara's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Appeal of StacySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Morse's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.