Legal Opinion
Richmond's Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 6, 2005No. LD-2003-001PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
On March 6, 2003, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition with this court requesting that the respondent, William M. Richmond, receive a six-month suspension from the practice of law. We referred the petition to a Judicial Referee (Temple, J.) for a hearing. The referee found by clear and convincing evidence that Richmond violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(a), 1.1(b)(1), 1.1(b)(5), 1.7(a), 1.7(b), 1.8(a), 7.1(a) and 8.4(a), and recommended suspension for six months and assessment of costs. We adopt the referee’s recommended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Wholey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Kersey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- O'Meara's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sheppard v. River Valley Fitness One, L.P.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Richmond v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Wolterbeek's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Coffey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In re Glenn Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.