Legal Opinion

Appeal of Stacy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 29, 2013No. 2012-300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

The petitioner, David Stacy, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Bar Association Public Protection Fund Committee (PPFC) denying his claim for reimbursement for the fees and costs that he and his conservatorship estate paid to attorney Donald Wyatt. The PPFC found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the funds at issue were lost as a result of Wyatt’s embezzlement, conversion, or theft. We affirm.

In In re Proposed Public Protection Fund Rule, 142 N.H. 588 (1998), we adopted Supreme Court Rule 55(2), which directs the New Hampshire Bar Association to establish the Public…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of YalkutNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. LAMONTAGNE BUILDERS, INC. v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Doherty's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. In re Estate of McCoolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Wyatt’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appeal of Estate of Beatrice JakobiecSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  2. Appeal of Estate of Beatrice JakobiecSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API