Legal Opinion

Nardi's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 24, 1998No. LD-96-011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition seeking disbarment of the respondent, Vincent J. Nardi, II. See SUP. CT. R. 37(13)(a:)V The Judicial Referee (Temple, J.) found by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent violated Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules) 1.15(a)(1), 1.15(c), 4.1(a), 8.4(a), and 8.4(c), and recommended suspénsion as a sanction. The respondent does not challenge either *605the referee’s rulings that he committed numerous ethical violations or the findings of fact which support those rulings, but urges a brief period of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Basbanes' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. Astles' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Wehringer's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Jones' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Budnitz' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Morgan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Bruzga's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. Bosse’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API