Legal Opinion

Fulmele v. Los Angeles Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1921No. Civ. No. 3428PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

On the nineteenth day of December, 1932, respondent sold to appellant 361 shares of its capital stock and issued a certificate therefor in consideration of the sum of $1,498.15 then and there paid. The complaint alleged two classes of facts which induced him to enter into this transaction; first, that respondent represented and stated that appellant could at any time demand and respondent would, upon such demand being made, redeem and repurchase from plaintiff said -shares of stock and return and repay to plaintiff the consideration paid therefor; also, that respondent made sundry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Brown v. Domestic Utilities Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Brooks v. Trustee Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API