Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Trustee Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1913No. 11369PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 27, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
On May 24, 1906, the appellant sold to the respondent two half-units, numbered 256 and 257, representing proportional undivided interests in its property No. 4, for the sum of $1,050, and gave the plaintiff the following memorandum:
“Seattle, May 24, 1906.
“Mrs. E. A. Brooks,
“City: In consideration of the purchase by you on this date of Inv. Bonds in our Property No. 4, to the extent of One Thousand Fifty Dollars (1050) we hereby agree that after you have consulted your sister or any one else in regard to this investment you desire to withdraw your investment you may at any time return these…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Shellar v. ShiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Larmon v. JordanIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Ellis's Admr. v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- McCollum v. NeimeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Mood v. MoodWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Fulmele v. Los Angeles Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Harris v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.