State v. Phillips
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
At the conclusion of the evidence defendants moved to dismiss the case on the grounds that the indictment against them was based solely on the perjured testimony of the State’s witness Joe Bill Deyton. The trial court’s denial of this motion constitutes defendants’ first assignment of error. Whether an indictment would ever be subject to dismissal on the foregoing grounds and, if so, under what circumstances, is a question we need not now explore since (1) there is no evidence that perjury was actually committed and (2) defendants’ motion to dismiss was untimely.
The sole…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- State v. IvySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. Burnett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FroggeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- People v. WiselyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Hill v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. ReinerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.