Legal Opinion

Hill v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1990No. 8917SC1380PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

In her first assignment of error, plaintiff argues that the superior court committed reversible error in granting defendants’ motion for dismissal pursuant to Rule 50. A motion for directed verdict tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. Wallace v. Evans, 60 N.C. App. 145, 298 S.E.2d 193 (1982). A court reviewing such a motion must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. The motion is granted only if the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to support a verdict…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Jones v. GwynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Fowle v. FowleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Burton v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Wilson v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Mays v. ClantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Wilkerson v. ThriftDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API