Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Reiner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2001No. Nos. 99-239 and 99-427Published

1DissentCook, J.

In State v. Reiner (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 342, 731 N.E.2d 662 (“Reiner /”), a majority of this court reversed Reiner’s conviction based on a belief that the trial court should not have granted transactional immunity to Susan Batt in order to compel her testimony. Id. at 352-356, 731 N.E.2d at 673-676. Because Batt had consistently denied culpability for Alex Reiner’s death, the Reiner I majority held that Batt lacked a valid Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and was therefore not entitled to immunity under R.C. 2945.44. Id. at 354, 731 N.E.2d at 674. The United States…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API